Talk:Optical fiber

Optical fiber was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 29, 2005	Good article nominee	Listed
January 16, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
February 11, 2009	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Networking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Telecommunications High‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Glass Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glass, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of glass on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlassWikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/GlassTemplate:WikiProject Glassglass
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

WDM

What about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavelength_division_multiplexing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.70.35.39 (talk) 19:31, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please add info about color coding of cables/connectors

Quote (http://www.thefoa.org/tech/connID.htm): Color Codes: Since the earliest days of fiber optics, orange, black or gray was multimode and yellow singlemode. However, the advent of metallic connectors like the FC and ST made color coding difficult, so colored boots were often used. The TIA 568 color code for connector bodies and/or boots is Beige for multimode fiber, Blue for singlemode fiber, and Green for APC (angled) connectors.

I was looking for this info, but didn't find it on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.228.42.32 (talk) 06:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Equipment costs to be added?

I think equipment costs for fusion splicing should be included in the article considering the pieces of equipment involved can exceed £50,000. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.98.76.45 (talk) 14:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution

The following sections were contributed by 59.161.83.214 (talk · contribs). I don't feel they're ready for inclusion in the article mainly due to WP:OR concerns but maybe someone can improve the material - Talk:Optical fiber/59.161.83.214 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kvng (talk • contribs) 15:36, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Loss calculation

Khrapkorr updated an example. The new fiber has a lower loss specification but the example was changed to indicate a lower transmission percentage. Something is inconsistent. ~Kvng (talk) 14:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The old example had 8 km of fiber, which did not make much sense to me. I used 10 km, which has -1.48 dB total attenuation at 1550 nm. Now use online dB-% converter and obtain 71.1%. Khrapkorr (talk) 23:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1.48dB ≈ 71% of power.

3 dB ≈ 71% of E-field amplitude. Constant314 (talk) 01:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

-1.48 dB = -.148 B; 10^-.148 = 71.1%. --Zac67 (talk) 06:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, my sanity check overlooked the fact that the new example uses a different length of fiber. ~Kvng (talk) 13:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]